#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 16 Supreme Court: Lawyers Not Subject to Consumer Protection Act. On May
In matter of Frank Vitus vs. Narcotics Control Bureau and ors. Frank Vitus, a person accused in drug case belonging to foreign nationality. The said matter was in trial before Delhi High court in which, it ordered the accused to furnish a surety amount of ₹. 2 lakhs for interim bail and also stated two conditions in which the accused must share the pin location on Google map to the Investigating officer. It also asked the accused for assurance from High Commission of Nigeria that accused would not leave India and will appear in front of trial Court.
The Petitioner Frank appealed the said order of Delhi HC in Supreme Court wherein the Court ordered stating that, sending pin location would amount to breach of Privacy (Article 21) further adding, that no embassy would take the liability of any person belonging to their nationality. The SC reduced the amount of surety to ₹. 50,000/-for granting interim bail (opposing Delhi HC amount of ₹.2 lakhs). The apex court concluded that the conditions stated by the Delhi HC were objectionable. The matter is still pending for further issues.
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 16 Supreme Court: Lawyers Not Subject to Consumer Protection Act. On May
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 15 Bengaluru Special Court Grants Bail to JD(S) Leader HD Revanna in
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 14 SC granted interim bail to Kejriwal specifying Bail Conditions The Supreme
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 13 Developers failure to fulfil timeframe contractual obligation leads to deficiency in
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 11 Right to Choose and reproductive freedom a fundamental right. The Supreme
#JANKAARBHARAT Blog 12 Pleading guilty won’t help in compromising for a lesser sentence. On